From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>
To: "Jeff V. Merkey" <jmerkey@vger.timpanogas.org>
Cc: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
pavel@suse.cz, kernel@blackhole.compendium-tech.com,
hps@tanstaafl.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
jmerkey@timpanogas.org
Subject: Re: Fasttrak100 questions...
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 22:42:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200012030342.WAA17517@tsx-prime.MIT.EDU> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Jeff V. Merkey's message of Sat, 2 Dec 2000 18:21:26 -0700, <20001202182126.A20944@vger.timpanogas.org>
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 18:21:26 -0700
From: "Jeff V. Merkey" <jmerkey@vger.timpanogas.org>
Under this argument, it is argued that the engineer who had source
code access "inevitably used" negative knowledge he gained from
his study of the Linux sources. Absent the vague descriptions of
what a "derivative work" is in the GPL, it could be argued that
conversion of any knowledge contained in GPL code is a "derivative
work".
That's bullshit. Copyright law very clearly states that it protects the
fixation of an idea in a medium, and that copyright explicitly does not
protect the idea itself. The concept of what is a derived work is very
clearly understood, and there have been a lot of court cases to define
this precedent. (My understanding is that in realm of music 7 notes in
sequence, if copied, is prima facie evidence that there is a derived
work. Not 5 notes, and not 8 notes, but seven notes. Gotta love those
lawyers at work. Aren't you glad they settled that?)
Personally, I think the doctrine is one of the most evil fucking things
in existence, legal opponents call it "the doctrine of intellectual
slavery" because it has the affect under the law to be able to convert
simple NDA agreements into non-compete agreements, and I've seen it
used this way.
That's a different matter. If you use NDA and Trade secret law, then
yes, might be able to enslave programmers using such a law. However
most courts have strict limits to how far they will take non-compete
arguments, and if an NDA turned into a non-compete, past a certain point
they will say that a person has a right to earn a living.....
Fortunately most judges will apply some amount of common sense, even
despite their law school training. In any case, the GPL doesn't involve
NDA's or Trade Secrets, so saying that this doctrine could be used to
contaminate non-GPL code simply by having people look at GPL code is
bullshit.
No question, though, the first thing we should do, is kill all the
lawyers. (And this is now definitely off-topic for the linux-kernel
list.)
- Ted
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-12-03 4:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-11-24 22:46 James Lamanna
2000-11-25 1:35 ` Andre Hedrick
2000-11-25 12:10 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2000-11-25 17:20 ` Andre Hedrick
2000-11-25 17:22 ` Andre Hedrick
2000-11-29 19:53 ` Dr. Kelsey Hudson
2000-11-29 20:08 ` Henning P . Schmiedehausen
2000-11-29 21:11 ` Andre Hedrick
2000-11-29 22:12 ` Stop your abusive language! (Re: Fasttrak100 questions...) Dominik Kubla
2000-11-29 23:52 ` Fasttrak100 questions Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-30 15:14 ` Christopher Friesen
2000-11-30 18:43 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-30 18:09 ` Christopher Friesen
2000-11-30 20:10 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-12-02 3:44 ` Peter Samuelson
2000-12-03 22:54 ` Pavel Machek
2000-12-05 4:10 ` Peter Samuelson
2000-11-29 20:42 ` Alan Cox
2000-11-29 21:05 ` Andre Hedrick
2000-11-29 21:10 ` James A Sutherland
2000-11-29 21:18 ` Alan Cox
2000-11-29 21:30 ` Andre Hedrick
2000-12-02 16:50 ` Pavel Machek
2000-12-02 17:18 ` Alan Cox
2000-12-02 23:46 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2000-12-03 1:21 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-12-03 1:31 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-12-03 3:42 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o [this message]
2000-12-03 5:11 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-12-05 7:07 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2000-12-05 8:25 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-12-03 16:41 Wayne.Brown
2000-12-03 17:49 ` Pavel Machek
2000-12-03 18:45 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200012030342.WAA17517@tsx-prime.MIT.EDU \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=hps@tanstaafl.de \
--cc=jmerkey@timpanogas.org \
--cc=jmerkey@vger.timpanogas.org \
--cc=kernel@blackhole.compendium-tech.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®