Re: [Fwd: NTFS repair tools]

[Andrzej Krzysztofowicz <ankry@pg.gda.pl>]

"Peter Samuelson wrote:"
> [Michael Warfield]
> > This thing is not armed and dangerous due to an act of ommision.
> > It's live and active only through three acts of commision.
> 
> We could make it *four* acts of commission. (: (: (:
> 
> diff -urk~ fs/Config.in
> --- fs/Config.in~	Mon Nov 13 01:43:42 2000
> +++ fs/Config.in	Thu Dec  7 23:00:34 2000
> @@ -37,7 +37,8 @@
>  tristate 'Minix fs support' CONFIG_MINIX_FS
>  
>  tristate 'NTFS file system support (read only)' CONFIG_NTFS_FS
> -dep_mbool '  NTFS write support (DANGEROUS)' CONFIG_NTFS_RW $CONFIG_NTFS_FS $CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL
> +dep_mbool '  NTFS write support (DANGEROUS)' CONFIG_MORON $CONFIG_NTFS_FS $CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL
> +dep_bool  '    Are you sure?  I hope you dont care about your NTFS filesystems' CONFIG_NTFS_RW $CONFIG_MORON
>  
>  tristate 'OS/2 HPFS file system support' CONFIG_HPFS_FS

Of course, you know that it *WILL NOT* work as CONFIG_MORON is nowhere 
defined ... ?

Andrzej
--
=======================================================================
  Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz               ankry@mif.pg.gda.pl
  phone (48)(58) 347 14 61
Faculty of Applied Phys. & Math.,   Technical University of Gdansk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/