From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 17:11:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 17:11:45 -0500 Received: from quattro.sventech.com ([205.252.248.110]:23050 "HELO quattro.sventech.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 17:11:31 -0500 Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 16:41:03 -0500 From: Johannes Erdfelt To: Heitzso Cc: "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" Subject: Re: usb broken in 2.4.0 test 12 versus 2.2.18 Message-ID: <20001218164101.D1627@sventech.com> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: ; from Heitzso on Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 04:33:26PM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 18, 2000, Heitzso wrote: > I have a Canon usb camera that I access via a > recent copy of the s10sh program (with -u option). > > Getting to the camera via s10sh -u worked through > large sections of 2.4.0 test X but broke recently. > I cannot say for certain which test/patch the > break occurred in. > > Running 2.4.0 test12 malloc errors appear. > Everything is fine with 2.2.18. I haven't tried > the test13 series of patches. > > key .config options: > CONFIG_USB on > DEVICEFS on > HOTPLUG on > UHCI on > everything else off (i.e. printers, keyboards, > mice, etc.). > > Baseline system is RH6.2 with most patches applied > (so avoiding RH7 compiler problems). Basic dev > environment is same (i.e. compiling the two kernels > on the same box). > > If someone wants to email me a debug sequence or > ask more specific questions feel free. Could you give us the exact error message you saw? JE - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/