From: Cesar Eduardo Barros <cesarb@nitnet.com.br>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TCP keepalive seems to send to only one port
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2000 12:12:28 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20001224121228.A340@flower.cesarb> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20001223213156.A1947@flower.cesarb> <20001224101455.A11662@gruyere.muc.suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <20001224101455.A11662@gruyere.muc.suse.de>; from ak@suse.de on Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 10:14:55AM +0100
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 10:14:55AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 09:31:56PM -0200, Cesar Eduardo Barros wrote:
> >
> > I've been doing some experiments with the keepalive code in 2.4.0-test10 here
> > (I want to avoid the 2.2.x NAT I'm using (for which I don't have root) from
> > timing out my connections). To test it, I reduced both tcp_keepalive_time and
> > tcp_keepalive_intvl to 1. Using ethereal, I saw that the keepalives were sent
> > as expected, but only for one of the two idle TCP connections I had to a given
> > host (I was testing with two remote hosts, each with two idle TCP connections,
> > one in port 5500 and the other in port 5501). I only saw activity on 5500, yet
> > netstat told me both were still active.
>
> I just tried it and it works fine here with 2.4.0-test13-pre
>
> You should be aware that the sysctls are only picked up after a timer timeout
> or when a socket is newly created. When the sockets are already active it
> takes a timeout for them to take effect. The default timeout is 2 hours.
>
I noticed that, so I exited the program and reloaded it after each change. I
still don't know why it worked only with the first socket here (both sockets
are opened by the same program). Maybe something changed in the networking code
since test10?
--
Cesar Eduardo Barros
cesarb@nitnet.com.br
cesarb@dcc.ufrj.br
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-12-24 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-12-23 23:31 Cesar Eduardo Barros
2000-12-24 0:19 ` David Schwartz
2000-12-24 0:38 ` Cesar Eduardo Barros
2000-12-24 1:52 ` James Morris
2000-12-24 2:20 ` Cesar Eduardo Barros
2000-12-25 15:27 ` Igmar Palsenberg
2000-12-25 14:58 ` Cesar Eduardo Barros
2000-12-26 0:33 ` David Schwartz
2000-12-26 0:46 ` Cesar Eduardo Barros
2000-12-26 0:59 ` David Schwartz
2000-12-24 9:14 ` Andi Kleen
2000-12-24 14:12 ` Cesar Eduardo Barros [this message]
2000-12-27 2:00 Bernd Eckenfels
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20001224121228.A340@flower.cesarb \
--to=cesarb@nitnet.com.br \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®