From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 4 Jan 2001 01:29:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 4 Jan 2001 01:28:53 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:34564 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 4 Jan 2001 01:28:39 -0500 Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 22:11:49 -0800 Message-Id: <200101040611.WAA01811@pizda.ninka.net> From: "David S. Miller" To: zaitcev@metabyte.com CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3A541361.65942CB3@metabyte.com> (message from Pete Zaitcev on Wed, 03 Jan 2001 22:08:33 -0800) Subject: Re: So, what about kwhich on RH6.2? In-Reply-To: <3A541361.65942CB3@metabyte.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 22:08:33 -0800 From: Pete Zaitcev Are we going to use Miquel's patch? I cannot build fresh 2.2.x on plain RH6.2 without it. The 2.2.19-pre6 comes out without it. Or is "install new bash" the official answer? Alan? I do not understand, I just got a working 2.2.19-pre6 build on one of my 6.2 Sparc64 systems, what kind of failure do you see? Later, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/