From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 4 Jan 2001 03:13:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 4 Jan 2001 03:13:00 -0500 Received: from Cantor.suse.de ([194.112.123.193]:55825 "HELO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 4 Jan 2001 03:12:51 -0500 Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 09:12:41 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: Andrew Morton Cc: Pete Zaitcev , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: So, what about kwhich on RH6.2? Message-ID: <20010104091241.B18973@gruyere.muc.suse.de> In-Reply-To: <3A541361.65942CB3@metabyte.com> <3A5430C6.FBAB094A@uow.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3A5430C6.FBAB094A@uow.edu.au>; from andrewm@uow.edu.au on Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 07:13:58PM +1100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 07:13:58PM +1100, Andrew Morton wrote: > Silly question: > > can't we just hardwire `kgcc' into the build system and be done > with all this kwhich stuff? It's just a symlink.... And break compilation on all non RedHat 7, non connectiva systems ? Would you volunteer to handle the support load on l-k that would cause? -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/