From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 5 Jan 2001 12:24:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 5 Jan 2001 12:24:09 -0500 Received: from ns.caldera.de ([212.34.180.1]:5382 "EHLO ns.caldera.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 5 Jan 2001 12:23:54 -0500 Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 18:23:09 +0100 Message-Id: <200101051723.SAA17498@ns.caldera.de> From: Christoph.Hellwig.@ns.caldera.de To: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Change of policy for future 2.2 driver submissions X-Newsgroups: caldera.lists.linux.kernel In-Reply-To: User-Agent: tin/1.4.1-19991201 ("Polish") (UNIX) (Linux/2.2.14 (i686)) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In article you wrote: >> In other words, there's no longer any such thing as a "stable" branch. The >> whole point of having separate production and development branches was to have >> one in which each succeeding patch could be counted upon to be more reliable > By your personal definition of stable 2.0.3x is the current stable kernel. Btw: Any chance to see an official 2.0.39 soon? 2.0.39final is out for about half a year now... Christoph -- Whip me. Beat me. Make me maintain AIX. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/