From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 8 Jan 2001 16:25:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 8 Jan 2001 16:24:58 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:907 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 8 Jan 2001 16:24:49 -0500 Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 13:07:02 -0800 Message-Id: <200101082107.NAA21378@pizda.ninka.net> From: "David S. Miller" To: riel@conectiva.com.br CC: hch@caldera.de, netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: (message from Rik van Riel on Mon, 8 Jan 2001 16:05:23 -0200 (BRDT)) Subject: Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 16:05:23 -0200 (BRDT) From: Rik van Riel I really think the zerocopy network stuff should be ported to kiobuf proper. That is how it could be done in 2.5.x, sure. But this patch is intended for 2.4.x so "minimum impact" applies. Later, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/