From: Ingo Oeser <ingo.oeser@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: Linux-2.4.x patch submission policy
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 22:33:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010108223343.O10035@nightmaster.csn.tu-chemnitz.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <937neu$p95$1@penguin.transmeta.com> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0101071434370.21675-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0101071434370.21675-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>; from riel@conectiva.com.br on Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 02:37:47PM -0200
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 02:37:47PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Once we are sure 2.4 is stable for just about anybody I
> will submit some of the really trivial enhancements for
> inclusion; all non-trivial patches I will maintain in a
> VM bigpatch, which will be submitted for inclusion around
> 2.5.0 and should provide one easy patch for those distribution
> vendors who think 2.4 VM performance isn't good enough for
> them ;)
Hmm, could you instead follow Andreas approach and have a
directory with little patches, that do _exactly_ one thing and a
file along to describe what is related, dependend and what each
patch does?
So people could try to suit them to their needs.
And they can tell you exactly _what_ change breaks instead of "It
doesn't work".
Thanks & Regards
Ingo Oeser
--
10.+11.03.2001 - 3. Chemnitzer LinuxTag <http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/linux/tag>
<<<<<<<<<<<< come and join the fun >>>>>>>>>>>>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-08 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-06 18:17 Linus Torvalds
2001-01-06 19:33 ` Alan Cox
2001-01-06 20:12 ` Linux-2.4.x patch submission policy (what about the -AC series?) Ben Greear
2001-01-07 16:37 ` Linux-2.4.x patch submission policy Rik van Riel
2001-01-08 21:33 ` Ingo Oeser [this message]
2001-01-08 20:40 ` Rik van Riel
2001-01-10 11:12 ` Roeland Th. Jansen
2001-01-16 19:55 ` Does reiserfs really meet the "Linux-2.4.x patch submission policy"? André Dahlqvist
2001-01-16 20:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-01-17 1:05 ` Aaron Lehmann
2001-01-17 1:14 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010108223343.O10035@nightmaster.csn.tu-chemnitz.de \
--to=ingo.oeser@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®