From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 15:03:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 15:02:54 -0500 Received: from hercules.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.132.33]:10254 "HELO smtp.pandora.be") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 15:02:40 -0500 Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 20:51:27 +0100 From: mo6 To: Robert Kaiser Cc: Brian Gerst , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Anybody got 2.4.0 running on a 386 ? Message-ID: <20010110205127.B982@pandora.be> In-Reply-To: <01010922090000.02630@rob> <3A5B7F76.ABDFED7A@didntduck.org> <01010922264400.02737@rob> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i In-Reply-To: <01010922264400.02737@rob>; from rob@sysgo.de on Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 10:17:47PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 10:17:47PM +0100, Robert Kaiser wrote: > On Die, 09 Jan 2001 you wrote: > > Robert Kaiser wrote: > > > I can't seem to get the new 2.4.0 kernel running on a 386 CPU. > > > The kernel was built for a 386 Processor, Math emulation has been enabled. > > > I tried three different 386 boards. Execution seems to get as far as > > > pagetable_init() in arch/i386/mm/init.c, then it falls back into the BIOS as > > > if someone had pressed the reset button. The same kernel boots fine on > > > 486 and Pentium Systems. > > > > > > Any ideas/suggestions ? > > > > > > is "Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor > > mode... " the last thing you see before the reset? > > > > No, I don't see _any_ messages from the kernel. The last thing I see is > "Uncompressing Linux... Ok, booting the kernel." I dug up an old amd 386 and started compiling kernels for it with gcc 2.95.2: 2.4.0 : doesn't boot, same symptoms as you, Robert, so you're not imagining things :-) 2.2.19pre6 : compiles, boots and runs poifectly 2.3.51 : doesn't compile 2.3.99-pre1 : hrm, *cough* 2.3.99-pre2 : *tsjoum* 2.3.39: compiles and boots okay here is where I got bored :-) okay, anyone, which 2.3.x kernels should compile okay ? With kind regards, Sven -- If the odds are a million to one against something occurring, chances are 50-50 it will. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/