From: Petri Kaukasoina <kaukasoi@elektroni.ee.tut.fi>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@turbolinux.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: EXT2-fs error in 2.4.0
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 22:39:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010110223916.A1131@elektroni.ee.tut.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010110171535.A206@elektroni.ee.tut.fi> <200101101904.f0AJ4St12593@webber.adilger.net>
In-Reply-To: <200101101904.f0AJ4St12593@webber.adilger.net>; from adilger@turbolinux.com on Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 12:04:28PM -0700
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 12:04:28PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> Decoding the first few words to hex, then ASCII gives
> sts.pte_spinlock
> #define pgtable_cache_size (pgt_quicklists.pgtable_cache_sz)
> #define pgd_
>
> and I it continues. The defines are from include/asm-sparc/pgalloc.h
> and it is possible the first few words are out-of-order frees of indirect
> blocks or something. In any case, were you just untarring a 2.4 kernel
> tree at the time of this problem? That would be a bad thing, since it
> would point to a bug still in the 2.4.0 kernel.
>
> Alternately, were you just rm -r an old kernel tree? Is it possible you
> have not fsck'd this filesystem since running one of 2.4.0-test10 through
> 2.4.0-test12 (or maybe even test13)? In this case, it is possible that
> the filesystem was corrupted with the older kernels, but you just didn't
> notice it if it was in an unused kernel tree.
It was a file system where I do not work much, so after looking the time
stamps of the directories and studying bash_history I am now rather sure
what I was doing then: 'rm -rf linux-2.2.19pre7'. But it was not exactly an
old kernel tree because I had built it only today morning while running
2.4.0. (It was not an old tree just patched today but I untarred it fresh
from a 2.2.18 tar ball and patched and compiled it after that). The box had
been running 2.4.0 continuously since Sunday 7 Jan and I rebooted it today
afternoon only after I had seen the fs error messages. Until Sunday I was
using only 2.2 kernels. Before Sunday and 2.4.0 the file system was last fscked
on Saturday the 6th because of a power loss!
I did once try some 2.4.0-test kernel on this box but it was a long time ago
(I don't remember which exact version number the kernel had). It seemed to
start up ok then but after starting netscape and moving its windows it hung
and I had to power reset the box and of course it fscked immediately. But it
was a long time ago and after that I have only used 2.2 kernels.
Hmm. It surely seems 2.4.0 is to blame here, I'm afraid.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-10 20:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-10 15:15 Petri Kaukasoina
2001-01-10 19:04 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-01-10 20:39 ` Petri Kaukasoina [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010110223916.A1131@elektroni.ee.tut.fi \
--to=kaukasoi@elektroni.ee.tut.fi \
--cc=adilger@turbolinux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®