From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 05:31:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 05:31:44 -0500 Received: from Cantor.suse.de ([194.112.123.193]:22020 "HELO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 05:31:37 -0500 Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 11:31:34 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: Danny ter Haar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Drivers under 2.4 Message-ID: <20010111113134.A20569@gruyere.muc.suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20010110223836.A7321@gruyere.muc.suse.de> <93k1k0$87v$1@voyager.cistron.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <93k1k0$87v$1@voyager.cistron.net>; from dth@lin-gen.com on Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 10:24:01AM +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 10:24:01AM +0000, Danny ter Haar wrote: > Version number of the driver is the same but it doesn't work. > > Any thoughts anyone ? "Doesn't work" isn't a very useful bug report. What happens exactly? Do the RX/TX/error counters increase when you try to send packets? -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/