From: Jamie Lokier <lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk>
To: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 02:13:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010115021341.B17465@pcep-jamie.cern.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010112204626.A2740@suse.cz> <E14HDqv-0005Fm-00@the-village.bc.nu> <20010114203823.A17160@pcep-jamie.cern.ch> <20010114233907.C2487@suse.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20010114233907.C2487@suse.cz>; from vojtech@suse.cz on Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 11:39:07PM +0100
> > Note that "hdparm -X34 -d1" enables old DMA, not UDMA. (The board was
> > advertised as UDMA capable but it isn't AFAIK).
Fwiw, -X34 does not fix the lockups for everyone else.
Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> Is the board still available for some testing?
The board is not in the same country as me (Wales vs. France), but I
visit it every few months so there is some chance of me testing it on
that timescale. AFAIK there are no computer experts in the area to
enable remote access ;-)
> It should be able to do UDMA33.
It does not look hopeful. Let us look at an old email:
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@tantalophile.demon.co.uk>
To: Michel Aubry <giovanni@sudfr.com>
Subject: Re: mozilla+XFree86+Linux-2.1.x => HARD LOCKUP (addition)
On Wed, Dec 09, 1998 at 04:30:34PM +0100, Michel Aubry wrote:
> Is this to say that your bios has no "select UDMA" or so capability???
> Is your motherboard an old one? (that was not udma compliant).
It has "Bus Master DMA" option, but no "UDMA" option. It's an FIC
PC-2011, manufactured about August 1997. I always assumed the hardware
did UDMA (that's one reason I bought it).
> you should edit via82c586.c , uncomment or add a
> "#define DISPLAY_VIA_TIMINGS"
> and recompile your kernel...
Will do, at my next recompile. Would that be with the patch you sent me?
> You ought to know that linux kernel via patch requires your bios to be
> udma compliant. If not, all you can do safely is run it dma only!
Is this strictly true? You've obviously got all the chipset docs, and I
doubt anything on the motherboard interferes with IDE timings/state
machines.
> > [root@tantalophile linux]# hdparm -I /dev/hda
> this one is not running udma!
I know, I did hdparm -X34 explicitly to avoid lockups.
> > [root@tantalophile linux]# hdparm -i /dev/hda
>
> this one is running udma!
And with these settings unchanged, the system locks up from time to
time.
-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-15 1:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-12 8:44 ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Andre Hedrick
2001-01-12 8:55 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Andre Hedrick
2001-01-12 17:51 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Linus Torvalds
2001-01-12 18:13 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Alan Cox
2001-01-12 18:37 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Linus Torvalds
2001-01-12 21:26 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Adrian Bunk
2001-01-12 18:17 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Andre Hedrick
2001-01-12 18:55 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Linus Torvalds
2001-01-12 19:46 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Vojtech Pavlik
2001-01-12 19:57 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Linus Torvalds
2001-01-12 20:24 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Vojtech Pavlik
2001-01-12 23:47 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Alan Cox
2001-01-13 13:45 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Vojtech Pavlik
2001-01-13 17:09 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Bryan O'Sullivan
2001-01-13 17:19 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Vojtech Pavlik
2001-01-13 0:09 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Linus Torvalds
2001-01-13 0:25 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Alan Cox
2001-01-12 16:43 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch John Heil
2001-01-13 0:52 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Linus Torvalds
2001-01-12 17:09 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch John Heil
2001-01-13 1:16 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Linus Torvalds
2001-01-15 10:15 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Matthias Andree
2001-01-13 1:12 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Andre Hedrick
2001-01-13 1:18 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Linus Torvalds
2001-01-13 1:24 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Andre Hedrick
2001-01-13 1:31 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Linus Torvalds
2001-01-13 1:48 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Andre Hedrick
2001-01-13 1:51 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Andre Hedrick
2001-01-13 14:02 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Vojtech Pavlik
2001-01-13 14:00 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Vojtech Pavlik
2001-01-13 19:46 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Alan Cox
2001-01-13 20:00 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Andre Hedrick
2001-01-14 3:41 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch TimO
2001-01-14 8:55 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Vojtech Pavlik
2001-01-15 13:06 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Stephen Clark
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.30.0101130559060.19743-100000@wr5z.localdomain>
2001-01-13 14:22 ` VIA IDE corruption - anyone experiencing it with 2.4.0? Vojtech Pavlik
2001-01-12 23:43 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Alan Cox
2001-01-13 2:43 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch davej
2001-01-13 13:42 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Vojtech Pavlik
2001-01-13 13:35 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Vojtech Pavlik
2001-01-14 19:38 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Jamie Lokier
2001-01-14 22:39 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Vojtech Pavlik
2001-01-15 0:06 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Albert Cranford
2001-01-15 23:47 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2001-01-15 1:13 ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
2001-01-13 3:03 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Tkil
2001-01-13 13:44 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Vojtech Pavlik
2001-01-13 22:06 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch junio
2001-01-13 7:12 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Andre Hedrick
2001-01-13 16:42 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch David Woodhouse
2001-01-13 17:04 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Linus Torvalds
2001-01-14 17:22 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch David Woodhouse
2001-01-13 18:54 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Russell King
2001-01-12 8:56 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Craig Schlenter
2001-01-13 23:40 ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Andrzej Krzysztofowicz
2001-01-14 8:46 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Vojtech Pavlik
2001-01-14 3:53 ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Tony Parsons
2001-01-14 8:31 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch David D.W. Downey
2001-01-14 9:03 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch David D.W. Downey
2001-01-15 10:29 ` ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Paul Flinders
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010115021341.B17465@pcep-jamie.cern.ch \
--to=lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®