From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 14:59:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 14:59:22 -0500 Received: from saturn.cs.uml.edu ([129.63.8.2]:16915 "EHLO saturn.cs.uml.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 14:59:16 -0500 From: "Albert D. Cahalan" Message-Id: <200101151959.f0FJxDB248265@saturn.cs.uml.edu> Subject: Re: 2.4.0-x features ? To: pierre.rousselet@wanadoo.fr (Pierre Rousselet) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 14:59:13 -0500 (EST) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3A628870.EA2C3BF9@wanadoo.fr> from "Pierre Rousselet" at Jan 15, 2001 06:19:44 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Pierre Rousselet writes: > 1) top (procps-2.0.7) gives me the messages : > 'bad data in /proc/uptime' > 'bad data in /proc/loadavg' > cat /proc/uptime > 1435.30 904.74 > cat /proc/loadavg > 0.01 0.21 0.29 1/17 19444 > What is wrong ? Which 2.4.0-x kernel, and how was procps compiled? (the broken gcc again perhaps?) You might as well get procps-010114.tar.gz (new just yesterday!) and compile it yourself. The top command seems to tolerate Red Hat's fixed gcc, which you should get if you are using Red Hat 7. http://www.cs.uml.edu/~acahalan/procps/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/