From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 05:20:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 05:20:09 -0500 Received: from [24.65.192.120] ([24.65.192.120]:52974 "EHLO webber.adilger.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 05:20:00 -0500 From: Andreas Dilger Message-Id: <200101171019.f0HAJSM04596@webber.adilger.net> Subject: Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? In-Reply-To: <3A656C09.4A40BBF5@mandrakesoft.com> "from Jeff Garzik at Jan 17, 2001 04:55:21 am" To: Jeff Garzik Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 03:19:28 -0700 (MST) CC: David Woodhouse , Andreas Dilger , Venkatesh Ramamurthy , "'Bryan Henderson'" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL73 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jeff writes: > David Woodhouse wrote: > > > > adilger@turbolinux.com said: > > > One reason why this may NOT ever make it into the kernel is that I > > > know "kernel poking at devices" is really frowned upon. > > > > A possible alternative is to specify drives by serial number. > > Currently mount(8) supports mounting by '-L