From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 20 Jan 2001 12:45:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 20 Jan 2001 12:45:12 -0500 Received: from minus.inr.ac.ru ([193.233.7.97]:11014 "HELO ms2.inr.ac.ru") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 20 Jan 2001 12:44:52 -0500 From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru Message-Id: <200101201728.UAA04351@ms2.inr.ac.ru> Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] To: andrea@suse.de (Andrea Arcangeli) Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 20:28:04 +0300 (MSK) Cc: mingo@elte.hu, torvalds@transmeta.com, raj@cup.hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20010119221327.C8717@athlon.random> from "Andrea Arcangeli" at Jan 19, 1 10:13:27 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello! > My argument applies to 2.4. The uncork _won't_ push on the wire the last > not mss-sized fragment until it's the last one in the write queue even once > cwnd and receiver window allows that. I think Look at the code again. You misread it. > wouldn't be setting nonalge unconditionally to 1 in You could guess that "1" in variable with name "nodelay" means nodelay. 8) The checks for tcp_skb_is_last() have nothing to do with nagling. Look into comments, they explain all the whys and whos. > The manpage disagrees with you: Do you jest? This manpages is wrong, or, to be more exact, is incomplete, which is common flaw of them. get/set mean nothing but read-only/changing, i.e. another important property missing in ioctl interface. Andrea, how long do you use manpages when designing? 8) > The BKL will be moved down in the next months Excellent. Alexey - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/