From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 20 Jan 2001 13:16:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 20 Jan 2001 13:16:45 -0500 Received: from minus.inr.ac.ru ([193.233.7.97]:23558 "HELO ms2.inr.ac.ru") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 20 Jan 2001 13:16:26 -0500 From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru Message-Id: <200101201803.VAA04679@ms2.inr.ac.ru> Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] To: raj@cup.hp.com (Rick Jones) Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 21:03:43 +0300 (MSK) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3A68AFBB.5750B564@cup.hp.com> from "Rick Jones" at Jan 19, 1 01:20:59 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello! > is there really > much value in the second request flowing to the server before the first > byte of the reply has hit? Yes, of course, it has lots of sense: f.e. all the icons, referenced parent page are batched to single well-coalesced stream without rtt delays between them. It is the only sense of pipelining yet. Otherwise, you get http/1.0 with keepalives. Alexey - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/