From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 20 Jan 2001 19:02:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 20 Jan 2001 19:02:47 -0500 Received: from a203-167-249-89.reverse.clear.net.nz ([203.167.249.89]:4100 "HELO metastasis.f00f.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 20 Jan 2001 19:02:34 -0500 Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 13:02:26 +1300 From: Chris Wedgwood To: James Sutherland Cc: Lincoln Dale , Kai Henningsen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dean gaudet Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Message-ID: <20010121130225.A1003@metastasis.f00f.org> In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20010121100103.02820730@171.69.63.141> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from mandrake@cam.ac.uk on Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 11:27:35PM +0000 X-No-Archive: Yes Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 11:27:35PM +0000, James Sutherland wrote: Also something to do with HTTP 1.1 being much harder to support properly in proxies due to the new cache control features etc.?? M$ proxy didn't do HTTP/1.1 at the time :) --cw - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/