From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 21 Jan 2001 19:13:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 21 Jan 2001 19:12:50 -0500 Received: from rdu25-12-060.nc.rr.com ([24.25.12.60]:55817 "EHLO explorer.dummynet") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 21 Jan 2001 19:12:35 -0500 Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 19:12:29 -0500 From: Dan Hopper To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [preview] Latest AMD & VIA IDE drivers with UDMA100 support Message-ID: <20010121191229.A3849@yoda.dummynet> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20010121173251.B1073@suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre2i In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In another dimension, Andre Hedrick remarked: > > > On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 01:42:41PM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > 1. Only a software guy would call it 'bounce'.. sounds funny ;-) > > Er...I help design some of the hardware and the rules, so I do more than > just software. So does 'echo' or 'reflections'sound better than 'bounce'? EEs talk about ground bounce and the like all the time. "reflections" are also fine. "Signal integrity" is the in-the-know phrase. Of course, most of us weren't english majors, so noone really cares all that much how you say it. Dan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/