From: Mike Kravetz <mkravetz@sequent.com>
To: Jun Nakajima <jun@sco.com>
Cc: lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] multi-queue scheduler update
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 09:08:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010123090849.A959@w-mikek2.sequent.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010118155311.B8637@w-mikek.des.sequent.com> <LYR76657-1923-2001.01.23-08.54.49--mikek#sequent.com@lyris.sequent.com>
In-Reply-To: <LYR76657-1923-2001.01.23-08.54.49--mikek#sequent.com@lyris.sequent.com>; from jun@sco.com on Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 11:49:27AM -0500
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 11:49:27AM -0500, Jun Nakajima wrote:
> I tried to run SDET (Software Development Environment Throughput), which
> basically is a system level, throughput oriented benchmark, on the 2.4.0
> kernel and 2.4.0 kernel with this patch.
Thanks for running this. I too remember SDET, but I won't claim
to be old. :)
We were doing some more analysis on the multi-queue scheduler and
noticed that performance has regressed since posting preliminary
numbers with the 2.4.0-test10 kernel. After comparing the code,
it looks like I have over-engineered for the worst case of lock
contention. This was done at the expense of the normal case.
I'm currently working on this situation and expect to have a new
patch out in the not too distant future.
I expect the numbers will get better.
--
Mike Kravetz mkravetz@sequent.com
IBM Linux Technology Center
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-23 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-18 23:53 Mike Kravetz
2001-01-19 0:26 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-19 0:51 ` [Lse-tech] " Andi Kleen
2001-01-19 1:14 ` John Clemens
2001-01-19 0:52 ` [Lse-tech] " Mike Kravetz
2001-01-19 1:30 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-19 1:34 ` Mike Kravetz
2001-01-19 20:49 ` Mike Kravetz
2001-01-19 21:51 ` Mike Kravetz
2001-01-19 22:03 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-01-19 22:18 ` Mike Kravetz
2001-01-19 23:24 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-01-19 1:39 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-01-19 16:06 ` David Lang
2001-01-19 1:00 ` Mark Hahn
2001-01-19 1:08 ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-19 1:23 ` Mike Kravetz
2001-01-19 1:38 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-01-19 1:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-19 1:48 ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-19 23:35 ` Mike Kravetz
2001-01-19 0:43 ` Gerhard Mack
2001-01-23 16:49 ` [Lse-tech] " Jun Nakajima
[not found] ` <LYR76657-1923-2001.01.23-08.54.49--mikek#sequent.com@lyris.sequent.com>
2001-01-23 17:08 ` Mike Kravetz [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010123090849.A959@w-mikek2.sequent.com \
--to=mkravetz@sequent.com \
--cc=jun@sco.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome