mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Kravetz <mkravetz@sequent.com>
To: Jun Nakajima <jun@sco.com>
Cc: lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] multi-queue scheduler update
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 09:08:49 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010123090849.A959@w-mikek2.sequent.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010118155311.B8637@w-mikek.des.sequent.com> <LYR76657-1923-2001.01.23-08.54.49--mikek#sequent.com@lyris.sequent.com>
In-Reply-To: <LYR76657-1923-2001.01.23-08.54.49--mikek#sequent.com@lyris.sequent.com>; from jun@sco.com on Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 11:49:27AM -0500

On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 11:49:27AM -0500, Jun Nakajima wrote:
> I tried to run SDET (Software Development Environment Throughput), which
> basically is a system level, throughput oriented benchmark, on the 2.4.0
> kernel and 2.4.0 kernel with this patch. 

Thanks for running this.  I too remember SDET, but I won't claim
to be old. :)

We were doing some more analysis on the multi-queue scheduler and
noticed that performance has regressed since posting preliminary
numbers with the 2.4.0-test10 kernel.  After comparing the code,
it looks like I have over-engineered for the worst case of lock
contention.  This was done at the expense of the normal case.
I'm currently working on this situation and expect to have a new
patch out in the not too distant future.

I expect the numbers will get better.
-- 
Mike Kravetz                                 mkravetz@sequent.com
IBM Linux Technology Center
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

      parent reply	other threads:[~2001-01-23 17:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-01-18 23:53 Mike Kravetz
2001-01-19  0:26 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-19  0:51   ` [Lse-tech] " Andi Kleen
2001-01-19  1:14     ` John Clemens
2001-01-19  0:52   ` [Lse-tech] " Mike Kravetz
2001-01-19  1:30     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-19  1:34       ` Mike Kravetz
2001-01-19 20:49         ` Mike Kravetz
2001-01-19 21:51           ` Mike Kravetz
2001-01-19 22:03             ` Davide Libenzi
2001-01-19 22:18               ` Mike Kravetz
2001-01-19 23:24                 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-01-19  1:39       ` Davide Libenzi
2001-01-19 16:06     ` David Lang
2001-01-19  1:00   ` Mark Hahn
2001-01-19  1:08     ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-19  1:23       ` Mike Kravetz
2001-01-19  1:38         ` Davide Libenzi
2001-01-19  1:35     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-19  1:48       ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-19 23:35   ` Mike Kravetz
2001-01-19  0:43 ` Gerhard Mack
2001-01-23 16:49 ` [Lse-tech] " Jun Nakajima
     [not found] ` <LYR76657-1923-2001.01.23-08.54.49--mikek#sequent.com@lyris.sequent.com>
2001-01-23 17:08   ` Mike Kravetz [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010123090849.A959@w-mikek2.sequent.com \
    --to=mkravetz@sequent.com \
    --cc=jun@sco.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome