From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 26 Jan 2001 09:13:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 26 Jan 2001 09:13:06 -0500 Received: from pcep-jamie.cern.ch ([137.138.38.126]:12815 "EHLO pcep-jamie.cern.ch") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 26 Jan 2001 09:12:41 -0500 Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 15:11:38 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier To: James Sutherland Cc: "David S. Miller" , Matti Aarnio , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Message-ID: <20010126151138.B6331@pcep-jamie.cern.ch> In-Reply-To: <14961.25754.449497.640325@pizda.ninka.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from jas88@cam.ac.uk on Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 01:52:22PM +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org James Sutherland wrote: > I was not suggesting ignoring these. OTOH, there is no reason to treat an > RST packet as "go away and never ever send traffic to this host again" - > i.e. trying another TCP connection, this time with ECN disabled, would be > acceptable. Using a different source port number, even. -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/