From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 11:52:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 11:52:10 -0500 Received: from pcep-jamie.cern.ch ([137.138.38.126]:59653 "EHLO pcep-jamie.cern.ch") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 11:52:02 -0500 Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 17:51:53 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier To: Dax Kelson Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Message-ID: <20010128175153.B9106@pcep-jamie.cern.ch> In-Reply-To: <20010126160342.B7096@pcep-jamie.cern.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from dax@gurulabs.com on Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 06:59:46PM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dax Kelson wrote: > Jamie Lokier said once upon a time (Fri, 26 Jan 2001): > > > Does ECN provide perceived benefits to the node using it? > > Why are you even making suggestions when you haven't even read the RFC? > > It seems that knowing what ECN is would be prerequisite to engaging in > discussion about it. I do know what ECN is thanks. Whether it provides _actual_ perceived benefits depends on how widely deployed ECN routers and servers are. -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/