From: Robert Siemer <Robert.Siemer@gmx.de>
To: torvalds@transmeta.com
Cc: jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PCI IRQ routing problem in 2.4.0
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 07:08:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010129070810S.siemer@panorama.hadiko.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10101282050180.5079-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010129052950H.siemer@panorama.hadiko.de> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10101282050180.5079-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Robert Siemer wrote:
> (...) that's really interesting..
>
> > Device 00:01.0 (slot 0): ISA bridge
> > INTA: link 0x01, irq mask 0x1eb8 [3,4,5,7,9,10,11,12]
> > INTB: link 0x02, irq mask 0x1eb8 [3,4,5,7,9,10,11,12]
> > INTC: link 0x03, irq mask 0x1eb8 [3,4,5,7,9,10,11,12]
> > INTD: link 0x04, irq mask 0x1eb8 [3,4,5,7,9,10,11,12]
>
> Your "link" values are in the range 1-4. Which makes perfect sense, but
> that's absolutely _not_ what the Linux SiS routing code expects (the code
> seems to expect them to be ASCII 'A' - 'D').
>
> It looks very much like "pirq_sis_get()" and "pirq_sis_set()" in
> arch/i386/kernel/pci-irq.c are broken for your setup.
>
> Can you replace them with the following:
>
> static int pirq_sis_get(struct pci_dev *router, struct pci_dev *dev, int pirq)
> {
> if (pirq <= 4) {
> u8 x;
> pci_read_config_byte(router, 0x40+pirq, &x);
> return (x & 0x80) ? 0 : (x & 0xf);
> }
> printk("Unknown SiS pirq value %d\n", pirq);
> return 0;
> }
>
> and
>
> static int pirq_sis_set(struct pci_dev *router, struct pci_dev *dev, int pirq, int irq)
> {
> if (pirq <= 4) {
> pci_write_config_byte(router, 0x40 + pirq, irq);
> return 1;
> }
> printk("Unknown SiS pirq value %d\n", pirq);
> return 0;
> }
>
> and see if that changes the behaviour.
It doesn't. A diff from the kernel output is following. Maybe it
helps...
Thanks,
Robert
--- dmesg.2.4.0.debug Sun Jan 28 21:09:46 2001
+++ dmesg.2.4.0 Mon Jan 29 06:25:53 2001
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-Linux version 2.4.0 (root@panorama.hadiko.de) (gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)) #4 Sun Jan 28 19:03:05 CET 2001
+Linux version 2.4.0 (root@panorama.hadiko.de) (gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)) #5 Mon Jan 29 06:19:16 CET 2001
BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
BIOS-e820: 000000000009fc00 @ 0000000000000000 (usable)
BIOS-e820: 0000000000000400 @ 000000000009fc00 (reserved)
@@ -231,8 +231,9 @@
bttv: using 2 buffers with 2080k (4160k total) for capture
BT848 and your chipset may not work together.
bttv: Bt8xx card found (0).
-IRQ for 00:09.0:0 -> PIRQ 04, mask 1eb8, excl 0000 -> newirq=11 -> got IRQ 7
-IRQ routing conflict in pirq table! Try 'pci=autoirq'
+IRQ for 00:09.0:0 -> PIRQ 04, mask 1eb8, excl 0000 -> newirq=11 -> got IRQ 11
+PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 00:09.0
+PCI: The same IRQ used for device 00:09.1
bttv0: Bt878 (rev 2) at 00:09.0, irq: 11, latency: 32, memory: 0xe7800000
bttv0: subsystem: 0070:13eb => Hauppauge WinTV => card=10
bttv0: model: BT878(Hauppauge new (bt878)) [autodetected]
@@ -278,8 +279,8 @@
ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx
SIS5513: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 09
PCI: Enabling device 00:01.1 (0000 -> 0001)
-IRQ for 00:01.1:0 -> PIRQ 01, mask 1eb8, excl 0000 -> newirq=12 -> assigning IRQ 12 ... OK
-PCI: Assigned IRQ 12 for device 00:01.1
+IRQ for 00:01.1:0 -> PIRQ 01, mask 1eb8, excl 0000 -> newirq=12 -> got IRQ 12
+PCI: Found IRQ 12 for device 00:01.1
PCI: The same IRQ used for device 00:01.2
PCI: The same IRQ used for device 00:0c.0
SIS5513: chipset revision 208
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-29 6:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200101290323.TAA05252@penguin.transmeta.com>
2001-01-28 20:58 ` Robert Siemer
2001-01-29 4:29 ` Robert Siemer
2001-01-29 4:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-01-29 5:11 ` Tim Hockin
2001-01-29 6:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-01-30 0:50 ` Via PCI IRQ routing problem related? (was: PCI IRQ routing problem in 2.4.0) Pete Toscano
2001-01-29 5:29 ` PCI IRQ routing problem in 2.4.0 (SiS results) Aaron Tiensivu
2001-01-29 5:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-01-29 7:10 ` PCI IRQ routing problem in 2.4.0 (SiS results part 2) Aaron Tiensivu
2001-01-29 7:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-01-29 7:11 ` Aaron Tiensivu
2001-01-29 5:30 ` PCI IRQ routing problem in 2.4.0 (SiS results) Aaron Tiensivu
2001-01-29 6:08 ` Robert Siemer [this message]
2001-01-29 6:24 ` PCI IRQ routing problem in 2.4.0 Linus Torvalds
2001-01-29 7:11 ` Robert Siemer
2001-01-29 7:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-01-29 17:19 ` Robert Siemer
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.21.0101291230070.29065-100000@notebook.diehl.home>
2001-01-29 14:41 ` Jeff Garzik
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.21.0101291801580.29065-400000@notebook.diehl.home>
2001-01-29 17:34 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010129070810S.siemer@panorama.hadiko.de \
--to=robert.siemer@gmx.de \
--cc=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=siemer@panorama.hadiko.de \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®