From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 11:52:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 11:51:59 -0500 Received: from mail.mediaways.net ([193.189.224.113]:21721 "HELO mail.mediaways.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 11:51:46 -0500 Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 17:21:55 +0100 From: Walter Hofmann To: Pavel Machek Cc: jamal , Chris Wedgwood , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: ECN: Clearing the air Message-ID: <20010129172155.A4712@frodo.uni-erlangen.de> In-Reply-To: <20010128150813.A1595@metastasis.f00f.org> <20010128225530.A1300@bug.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <20010128225530.A1300@bug.ucw.cz>; from pavel@suse.cz on Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 10:55:30PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Pavel Machek wrote: > Does not that mean that Linux 2.0.10 mistakenly announces it is ECN > capable when offered ECN connection? No, the RFC deals with this. Walter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/