From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 16:02:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 16:02:07 -0500 Received: from twilight.cs.hut.fi ([130.233.40.5]:40781 "EHLO twilight.cs.hut.fi") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 16:02:00 -0500 Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 23:01:47 +0200 From: Ville Herva To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Knowing what options a kernel was compiled with Message-ID: <20010129230147.H1002@niksula.cs.hut.fi> In-Reply-To: <4461B4112BDB2A4FB5635DE1995874320223F3@mail0.myrio.com> <032601c08a36$0c8d5570$0100a8c0@homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <032601c08a36$0c8d5570$0100a8c0@homeip.net>; from eccesys@topmail.de on Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 08:56:12PM -0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 08:56:12PM -0000, you [mirabilos] claimed: > From: "Torrey Hoffman" > > Should someone submit a patch to copy the .config to a standard location as > > part of "make install" or "make modules_install"? If included in the > > official sources, that good example would encourage the distribution > > maintainers do the same. I find this neat: http://www.it.uc3m.es/~ptb/proconfig/ It created /proc/config entry with obvious functionality, but wastes pretty little ram. -- v -- v@iki.fi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/