From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 04:17:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 04:17:25 -0500 Received: from mail15.bigmailbox.com ([209.132.220.46]:15122 "EHLO mail15.bigmailbox.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 04:17:05 -0500 Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 01:16:27 -0800 Message-Id: <200101310916.BAA30755@mail15.bigmailbox.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary X-Mailer: MIME-tools 4.104 (Entity 4.116) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-Ip: [24.5.157.48] From: "Quim K Holland" To: mingo@elte.hu Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: RAID1/RAID5 hot-add/hot-remove patch? Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thanks for your reply. On the same topic; I am also wondering if there is a reason why your RAID1/RAID5 hot-add/hot-remove patch (originally against 2.4.0-ac9, Message-ID: ) does not go into Linus tree. I saw Neil Brown commenting on the patch in linux-raid list in (he was suggesting to revert it for somebody who had raid related crashes), but do not know what happened after that discussion. Alan Cox still seems to have the hot-add/hot-remove patch in his tree as of 2.4.0-ac12. ------------------------------------------------------------ --== Sent via Deja.com ==-- http://www.deja.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/