From: Walter Hofmann <walter.hofmann@physik.stud.uni-erlangen.de>
To: Gregory Maxwell <greg@linuxpower.cx>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NT soon to surpass Linux in specweb99 performance?
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 21:18:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010201211820.A12055@frodo.uni-erlangen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010201143825.A21237@xi.linuxpower.cx>
In-Reply-To: <20010201143825.A21237@xi.linuxpower.cx>; from greg@linuxpower.cx on Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 02:38:25PM -0500
On Thu, 01 Feb 2001, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> Looks like TUX caught MS's attention:
> http://www.spec.org/osg/web99/results/res2000q4/web99-20001211-00082.html
>
> Anyone know if their method of achieveing this is as flexible as TUX, or is
> their "SWC 3.0" simply mean 'spec web cheat' and involve implimenting the
> specweb dyanmic stuff in x86 assembly in their microkernel? :)
SWC = Scaleable Web Cache
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/iis/swc2.asp has more information about
SWC 2.0. Microsoft published SpecWeb96 results for IIS+SWC 2.0, but not
for SpecWeb99. I would guess that SWC 2.0 didn't help performance for
dynamic content.
Looks like they fixed this with SWC 3.0.
Walter
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-01 20:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-01 19:38 Gregory Maxwell
2001-02-01 20:04 ` Paul Flinders
2001-02-01 20:03 ` Denis Perchine
2001-02-02 14:50 ` Michael Poole
2001-02-01 20:18 ` Walter Hofmann [this message]
2001-02-01 21:28 ` J Sloan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010201211820.A12055@frodo.uni-erlangen.de \
--to=walter.hofmann@physik.stud.uni-erlangen.de \
--cc=greg@linuxpower.cx \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®