From: Andrey Savochkin <saw@saw.sw.com.sg>
To: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>,
vido@ldh.org, Ion Badulescu <ionut@moisil.cs.columbia.edu>
Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: eepro100.c, kernel 2.4.1
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 15:55:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010208155531.A28624@saw.sw.com.sg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200102080723.f187N1v17541@moisil.dev.hydraweb.com> <200102080742.f187gqK01498@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <200102080742.f187gqK01498@devserv.devel.redhat.com>; from "Alan Cox" on Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 02:42:52AM
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 02:42:52AM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
> > It's the printk that gets it wrong, although that's harmless.
> > Intel's documentation states that the bug does NOT exist if the
> > bits 0 and 1 in eeprom[3] are 1. Thus, the workaround is correct,
> > the printk is wrong.
>
> So why does it fix the problem for him. His report and your reply don't
> make sense viewed together
First of all, I have information that the bug may be in 82557 only.
Augustin, could you provide full information about your cards (including the
text printed by the driver at the initialization) and elaborate on "failing
under high load"?
Best regards
Andrey
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-08 7:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-08 5:53 [PATCH] " Augustin Vidovic
2001-02-08 7:23 ` Ion Badulescu
2001-02-08 7:37 ` Augustin Vidovic
2001-02-08 7:42 ` Alan Cox
2001-02-08 7:55 ` Andrey Savochkin [this message]
2001-02-08 7:59 ` Ion Badulescu
2001-02-08 10:41 ` Augustin Vidovic
2001-02-08 11:00 ` Ion Badulescu
2001-02-08 11:15 ` Augustin Vidovic
2001-02-08 11:26 ` Ion Badulescu
2001-02-08 11:44 ` Augustin Vidovic
2001-02-08 11:53 ` Ion Badulescu
2001-02-08 12:08 ` Augustin Vidovic
2001-02-12 5:32 ` Andrey Savochkin
2001-02-12 9:00 ` Ion Badulescu
2001-02-20 6:30 ` Augustin Vidovic
2001-02-20 7:21 ` Andrey Savochkin
2001-02-20 8:18 ` Augustin Vidovic
2001-02-20 23:38 ` Andrey Savochkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010208155531.A28624@saw.sw.com.sg \
--to=saw@saw.sw.com.sg \
--cc=alan@redhat.com \
--cc=ionut@moisil.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=vido@ldh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®