From: Grant Grundler <grundler@cup.hp.com>
To: Philipp Rumpf <prumpf@mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com>,
Tim Waugh <twaugh@redhat.com>, Andrew Morton <andrewm@uow.edu.au>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] 2.4.2-pre3: parport_pc init_module bug
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 18:26:55 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200102150227.SAA11922@milano.cup.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 14 Feb 2001 15:12:22 PST." <Pine.LNX.3.96.1010214150801.12746Q-100000@mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com>
Philipp Rumpf wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Grant Grundler wrote:
> > Having people look things up in the spec isn't very user friendly.
>
> Having the constants in some well-known header file should be sufficient,
> shouldn't it ?
I would hope anyone bothering to include the constants in a document would
spend a few minutes explaining them as well. Perhaps a bad assumption
on my part...
> It depends on the platform and maybe the exact PCI slot used, but I don't
> think it depends on the driver (unless MSI support is broken in which case
> you would want to fix it up in the driver).
correct.
> At least I can't find
> anything in the PCI 2.2 spec that would suggest we need to consult the
> driver before enabling MSIs with one message only.
I don't know how BIOS's treat this (if at all). Need to know this first.
If they manage this resource and pre-assign everything, ok.
That's how it goes.
But if generic PCI manages this, I prefer to avoid allocating resources
that may not get used. The host platform may have a limited pool of
usable MSI data values (think parisc EIRR bits) and some cards may want
to use more than one MSI.
grant
ps. seems this thread has gotten a bit far off from the original subject. :^/
Grant Grundler
parisc-linux {PCI|IOMMU|SMP} hacker
+1.408.447.7253
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-15 2:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-13 23:43 Tim Waugh
2001-02-14 8:03 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-02-14 8:53 ` James Sutherland
2001-02-14 10:53 ` Tim Waugh
2001-02-14 11:14 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-02-14 11:18 ` Tim Waugh
2001-02-14 11:21 ` Andrew Morton
2001-02-14 11:17 ` Tim Waugh
2001-02-14 11:24 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-02-14 11:40 ` Philipp Rumpf
2001-02-14 17:25 ` Grant Grundler
2001-02-14 21:12 ` Philipp Rumpf
2001-02-15 2:26 ` Grant Grundler [this message]
2001-02-18 15:05 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-02-14 11:31 ` Philipp Rumpf
2001-02-14 11:17 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200102150227.SAA11922@milano.cup.hp.com \
--to=grundler@cup.hp.com \
--cc=andrewm@uow.edu.au \
--cc=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prumpf@mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com \
--cc=twaugh@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®