On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 01:37:16PM -0600, Thomas Dodd wrote:
> Robert Read wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 02:30:08AM +0900, Ishikawa wrote:
> > >
> > > Has anyone tried 128K buffer size in kernel/printk.c
> > > and still have the kernel boot (without
> > > hard to notice memory corruption problems  and other subtle bugs)?
> > > Any hints and tips will be appreciated.
> > 
> > I have used 128k and larger buffer sizes, and I just noticed this
> > fragment in the RedHat Tux Webserver patch.  It creates a 2MB buffer:
> 
> I think this should be a config option.

Ok, here is a simple patch to add a config option, I'm compiling it
now, so it's not tested yet.  One question: what is the best way to
force this option to be a power of 2?

robert