From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:42:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:42:37 -0500 Received: from dfw7-1.relay.mail.uu.net ([199.171.54.106]:47860 "EHLO dfw7-1.relay.mail.uu.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:42:31 -0500 Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:41:11 -0600 From: Neal Nelson Message-Id: <200102222241.QAA22241@nna002.nna.com> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Shaper? CBQ? Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I am trying to set up a Linux box as a bridge that will limit throughput (and maybe even introduce delays in forwarding). I am running 2.2.16-22 (RedHat 7.0). I have bridging working between two lan cards. I thought maybe I could limit transmit speed on one lan card with shaper0 and limit the transmit speed of the other lan card as shaper1. When I try to configure shaper1 I get a "no such device" message. The shaper.c source code shows shaper0-3. Should there be a shaper1? Can I shape two cards on the same machine? If so how? If not, should I configure two machines as bridges and shape one card in each machine? Should the shaper code work with the bridging code? Should I not use shaper at all? Maybe I should use CBQ? Thanks in advance. Neal Nelson neal@nna.com