From: tor@spacetec.no (Tor Arntsen)
To: timw@splhi.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Will Mosix go into the standard kernel?
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 11:22:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200103021022.LAA08534@pallas.spacetec.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Tim Wright <timw@splhi.com> "Re: Will Mosix go into the standard kernel?" (Mar 1, 20:13)
On Mar 1, 20:13, Tim Wright wrote:
[discussion about commercial customers and kernels snipped]
I don't think we disagree, actually. My point was a different one.
With vendor-patched kernels you can either stick to the hacked kernel
or you can move on to an ftp.kernel.org kernel. For the type of hacks
that RedHat & co are doing it shouldn't matter. If it did, I mean if
they deliver hacked software that only works with a hacked kernel,
*then* I would be angry. That would mean that I would have to track
the patches they did, and apply them myself to new kernels. OR I
would have to sit back and wait for them to come out with an updated
distro, sometime in the future. Not good.
What was brought up in this discussion about clustering patches was
that that kind of model would be a good idea. I disagree. One thing
is to deliver patches because integration is not currently possible, or
practical, or whatever, but to point to the RedHat hacked-kernels-are-us
model as a *goal*, that's what I don't like. It's sometimes a necessity,
but it's not something that should be encouraged.
Cheers,
-Tor
next reply other threads:[~2001-03-02 10:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-03-02 10:22 Tor Arntsen [this message]
[not found] <fa.o4k0c0v.smgv2v@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.m9jgfcv.17n8s2n@ifi.uio.no>
2001-03-01 15:02 ` Tor Arntsen
2001-03-01 19:13 ` Tim Wright
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-02-27 17:31 Christopher Chimelis
2001-02-27 17:40 ` Zack Brown
2001-02-27 17:17 Zack Brown
2001-02-27 21:20 ` David L. Nicol
2001-02-27 21:32 ` Rik van Riel
2001-02-28 23:06 ` Daniel Ridge
2001-02-28 23:58 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-03-01 0:53 ` Dan Hollis
2001-03-01 1:35 ` Daniel Ridge
2001-03-01 2:37 ` zbrown
2001-03-02 0:52 ` Pavel Machek
2001-02-27 21:37 ` Alexander Viro
2001-02-27 21:56 ` Zack Brown
2001-02-27 22:29 ` zbrown
2001-02-27 22:33 ` J . A . Magallon
2001-02-28 17:59 ` Ric Wheeler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200103021022.LAA08534@pallas.spacetec.no \
--to=tor@spacetec.no \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=timw@splhi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®