mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: gettimeofday question
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 12:49:04 +0000 (GMT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200103031249.f23Cn4R01208@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)

Hi,

I've noticed that one of my machines here suffers from the "time going
backwards problem" and so started thinking about the x86 solution.

I've come to the conclusion that it has a hole which could cause it
to return the wrong time in one specific case:

- in do_gettimeofday(), we disable irqs (read_lock_irqsave)
- the ISA timer wraps, but we've got interrupts disabled, so no update
  of xtime or jiffies occurs
- in do_slow_gettimeoffset(), we read the timer, which has wrapped
- since jiffies_p != jiffies, we do not apply any correction
- our idea of time is now one jiffy slow.

Further more, while do_gettimeofday() is still within the
read_lock_irqsave, we spin_unlock(&i8253_lock) in do_slow_gettimeoffset()
and _re-enable_ interrupts!  This means when we later read xtime, we're
doing it with interrupts enabled.

This applies to both 2.2.18 and 2.4.2.

--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)                The developer of ARM Linux
             http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html


             reply	other threads:[~2001-03-03 12:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-03-03 12:49 Russell King [this message]
2001-03-03 16:24 ` Russell King
2001-03-19  7:33 ` Russell King
2001-03-19 11:39   ` Jamie Lokier
2001-03-19 18:26     ` Eli Carter
2001-03-19 19:06       ` Russell King
2001-03-19 19:49         ` Eli Carter
2001-03-19 21:34           ` Russell King
2001-03-19 22:54             ` Eli Carter
2001-03-19 23:44               ` Russell King
2001-03-20 15:27                 ` Eli Carter
2001-03-21 22:14             ` Eli Carter
2001-03-21 22:27               ` Eli Carter
2001-03-21 23:10                 ` Eli Carter
2001-03-21 23:27               ` Question on binutils release to use Anthony Barbachan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200103031249.f23Cn4R01208@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®