From: Jamie Lokier <lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Hashing and directories
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 14:41:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010307144120.A9878@pcep-jamie.cern.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0103011547200.11577-100000@weyl.math.psu.edu> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0103012103140.754-100000@penguin.homenet> <20010302095608.G15061@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20010307013729.A7184@pcep-jamie.cern.ch> <984bur$lqq$1@penguin.transmeta.com>
In-Reply-To: <984bur$lqq$1@penguin.transmeta.com>; from torvalds@transmeta.com on Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 08:03:39PM -0800
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> The long-term solution for this is to create the new VM space for the
> new process early, and add it to the list of mm_struct's that the
> swapper knows about, and then just get rid of the pages[MAX_ARG_PAGES]
> array completely and instead just populate the new VM directly. That
> way the destination is swappable etc, and you can also remove the
> "put_dirty_page()" loop later on, as the pages will already be in their
> right places.
>
> It's definitely not a one-liner, but if somebody really feels strongly
> about this, then I can tell already that the above is the only way to do
> it sanely.
Yup. We discussed this years ago, and it nobody thought it important
enough. mm->mmlist didn't exist then, and creating it it _just_ for
this feature seemed too intrusive. I agree it's the only sane way to
completely remove the limit.
-- Jamie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-03-07 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-22 23:08 Bill Crawford
2000-01-01 2:02 ` Pavel Machek
2001-03-01 20:54 ` Alexander Viro
2001-03-01 21:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-03-01 21:13 ` Alexander Viro
2001-03-01 21:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-03-02 9:04 ` Pavel Machek
2001-03-02 12:01 ` Oystein Viggen
2001-03-02 12:26 ` Tobias Ringstrom
2001-03-02 12:58 ` David Weinehall
2001-03-02 19:33 ` Tim Wright
2001-03-12 10:05 ` Herbert Xu
2001-03-12 10:43 ` Xavier Bestel
2001-03-01 21:23 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-03-01 21:26 ` Bill Crawford
2001-03-01 21:05 ` Tigran Aivazian
2001-03-02 8:56 ` Pavel Machek
2001-03-07 0:37 ` Jamie Lokier
2001-03-07 4:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-03-07 13:41 ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
2001-03-02 9:00 ` Pavel Machek
2001-03-03 0:03 ` Bill Crawford
2001-03-08 12:42 ` Goswin Brederlow
2001-04-27 16:20 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-02-22 23:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-02-22 23:54 ` Bill Crawford
2001-03-10 11:22 ` Kai Henningsen
2001-03-07 15:56 Manfred Spraul
2001-03-07 16:10 ` Jamie Lokier
2001-03-07 16:23 ` Manfred Spraul
2001-03-07 18:21 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010307144120.A9878@pcep-jamie.cern.ch \
--to=lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®