From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 04:01:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 04:01:49 -0400 Received: from owns.warpcore.org ([216.81.249.18]:64402 "EHLO owns.warpcore.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 04:01:44 -0400 Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 03:01:00 -0500 From: Stephen Clouse To: Yann Dupont Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Oracle 8I & Kernel 2.4.3 : Sane ? Message-ID: <20010403030100.B3489@owns.warpcore.org> In-Reply-To: <986213560.24497.2.camel@olive> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline; filename="msg.pgp" User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <986213560.24497.2.camel@olive>; from Yann.Dupont@IPv6.univ-nantes.fr on Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 02:12:40PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 02:12:40PM +0200, Yann Dupont wrote: > Is oracle 8.1.5 + Kernel 2.4.3 a sane combination ? > In general is oracle + Kernel 2.4 working ? 2.4.3 I can't speak for, but we have been running our development server (Oracle 8.1.6) on 2.4.2 since the day it was released. No problems whatsoever. I'd recommend consulting the Oracle docs as to what is screwed with your rollback segments. I highly doubt this is Linux's fault. - -- Stephen Clouse Senior Programmer, IQ Coordinator Project Lead The IQ Group, Inc. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.8 iQA/AwUBOsmDOwOGqGs0PadnEQI0qQCdFS+PLvff8YxstOUAB33gSoyRsfkAoKeP n87LAwm5FrYIjFG8/WXh0IEh =LCx9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----