From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 15:26:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 15:26:20 -0400 Received: from zmailer.org ([194.252.70.162]:3588 "EHLO zmailer.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 15:26:04 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 22:25:55 +0300 From: Matti Aarnio To: Dave Zarzycki Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Your response is requested Message-ID: <20010417222555.L805@mea-ext.zmailer.org> In-Reply-To: <20010417190405.PTFU6564.tomts8-srv.bellnexxia.net@mail.vger.kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from dave@zarzycki.org on Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 12:18:48PM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 12:18:48PM -0700, Dave Zarzycki wrote: > On Tue, 17 Apr 2001 J.I.@thor.sbay.org wrote: > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > Arrggg!!! Mumble... grumble... F*cking spammer using my hostname as the > from address for sending spam... Actually not. Either your MTA, or your MUA did that. I got: From: J. I. This particular detail -- when to add canonical domain to e.g. From: address, and when not -- is implemented rather fuzzily usually.. > Dave Zarzycki /Matti Aarnio