mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>
To: "Manfred Bartz" <md-linux-kernel@logi.cc>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Real Time Traffic Flow Measurement - anybody working on it?
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 13:58:29 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010420135829.F2461@tatooine.laforge.distro.conectiva> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010419041557.26172.qmail@logi.cc>
In-Reply-To: <20010419041557.26172.qmail@logi.cc>; from md-linux-kernel@logi.cc on Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 02:15:56PM +1000

On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 02:15:56PM +1000, Manfred Bartz wrote:
> Through the stimulating discussion we had under ``IP Acounting 
> Idea for 2.5'', it appears that a separate Traffic Flow Measure-
> ment and Accounting sub-system would be useful. See:
>         <http://logi.cc/linux/CounterReset/>

Hey cool. Now we've come to a point where we agree. If you want to do
serious accounting, iptables is not the subsystem of your choice.

As you've pointed out on your very enthusiastic homepage:

    * Mixing fundamentally different functionalities like security and
    * accounting in a firewall is not a good idea anyway. It leads to overly
    * complex firewall code (potentially thousands of rules just for
    * accounting) and unreliable accounting (f.e. when the firewall rules get
    * reloaded).


> I would also like to know if there are any objections to providing
> a RTFM interface in the kernel (as an optional module).

No, not at all. I'd like to help developing an RTFM meter for linux.
I guess we don't actually need to keep seperate flow information, but
could attach it to the netfilter connection tracking.

> Manfred Bartz

-- 
Live long and prosper
- Harald Welte / laforge@gnumonks.org                http://www.gnumonks.org
============================================================================
GCS/E/IT d- s-: a-- C+++ UL++++$ P+++ L++++$ E--- W- N++ o? K- w--- O- M- 
V-- PS+ PE-- Y+ PGP++ t++ 5-- !X !R tv-- b+++ DI? !D G+ e* h+ r% y+(*)

      parent reply	other threads:[~2001-04-20 17:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-04-19  4:15 Manfred Bartz
2001-04-19 14:45 ` Michael Clark
2001-04-19 21:35   ` Edgar Toernig
2001-04-20 16:58 ` Harald Welte [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010420135829.F2461@tatooine.laforge.distro.conectiva \
    --to=laforge@gnumonks.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=md-linux-kernel@logi.cc \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®