From: Bob McElrath <mcelrath+linux@draal.physics.wisc.edu>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: generic rwsem [Re: Alpha "process table hang"]
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 18:27:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010423182722.B942@draal.physics.wisc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010411125731.B6472@draal.physics.wisc.edu> <E14nOzo-0007Ew-00@the-village.bc.nu> <20010413084805.B3118@draal.physics.wisc.edu> <20010417170717.H2696@athlon.random> <20010417102840.B21824@draal.physics.wisc.edu> <20010419112117.E22687@draal.physics.wisc.edu> <20010419191706.D752@athlon.random>
In-Reply-To: <20010419191706.D752@athlon.random>; from andrea@suse.de on Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 07:17:06PM +0200
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1861 bytes --]
Andrea Arcangeli [andrea@suse.de] wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:21:17AM -0500, Bob McElrath wrote:
> > I'm at 2 days uptime now, and have not seen the process-table-hang.
> > Looks like this fixed it. Previously I would get a hang in the first
> > day or so. I'm using your alpha-numa-3 and rwsem-generic-4 against
> > 2.4.4pre3.
>
> good, thanks for the report.
>
> BTW, if you upgrade to 2.4.4pre4 you can apply those two patches:
>
> ftp://ftp.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/kernels/v2.4/2.4.4pre4aa1/00_alpha-numa-4
> ftp://ftp.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/kernels/v2.4/2.4.4pre4aa1/00_rwsem-generic-6
>
> really the first is not necessary anymore unless you're using a wildfire. The
> second also resurrect the optimized rwsemaphores for all archs but alpha and
> ia32.
Well, take that back, I just got it to hang. Again, this is 2.4.4pre3
with alpha-numa-3 and rwsem-generic-4. I saw it upon starting mozilla.
I also saw some scary filesystem errors that may or may not be related:
Apr 23 18:09:40 draal kernel: EXT2-fs error (device sd(8,2)):
ext2_new_block: Free blocks count corrupted for block group 252
There has been a lot of discussion on the topic of rwsems (that,
admittedly, I haven't followed very closely). It looks like
rwsem-generic-6 is the latest from Andrea, I'll build a new 2.4.4pre4
kernel with these patches and let you know the results. Have you made
changes between rwsem-generic-4 and rwsem-generic-6 that would
fix/prevent a deadlock?
Let me know if there are any useful tests I could perform. Would it be
useful for me to run the rwsem benchmarks you've been using? Could
these detect a deadlock situation?
Cheers,
-- Bob
Bob McElrath (rsmcelrath@students.wisc.edu)
Univ. of Wisconsin at Madison, Department of Physics
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 240 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-23 23:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-11 15:40 Alpha "process table hang" Bob McElrath
2001-04-11 16:44 ` Peter Rival
2001-04-11 17:00 ` Bob McElrath
2001-04-11 17:18 ` Peter Rival
2001-04-11 17:57 ` Bob McElrath
[not found] ` <E14nOzo-0007Ew-00@the-village.bc.nu>
2001-04-13 13:48 ` Bob McElrath
2001-04-17 15:07 ` generic rwsem [Re: Alpha "process table hang"] Andrea Arcangeli
2001-04-17 15:28 ` Bob McElrath
2001-04-19 16:21 ` Bob McElrath
2001-04-19 17:17 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-04-23 23:27 ` Bob McElrath [this message]
2001-04-23 23:40 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-04-17 15:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2001-04-17 16:59 ` David Howells
2001-04-17 17:55 ` Andrea Arcangeli
[not found] ` <200104111642.f3BGg6930131@kanga.hofr.at>
2001-04-11 18:49 ` Alpha "process table hang" Bob McElrath
2001-04-17 19:18 generic rwsem [Re: Alpha "process table hang"] D.W.Howells
2001-04-17 20:49 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-04-17 21:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2001-04-17 22:06 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-04-17 21:48 D.W.Howells
2001-04-17 23:06 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-04-17 23:54 D.W.Howells
2001-04-18 20:49 ` Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010423182722.B942@draal.physics.wisc.edu \
--to=mcelrath+linux@draal.physics.wisc.edu \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®