mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Kurt Garloff <kurt@garloff.de>,
	Linux kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: read perf improved by mounting ext2?
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 10:58:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010424105858.C9357@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010424013150.A6892@garloff.etpnet.phys.tue.nl>
In-Reply-To: <20010424013150.A6892@garloff.etpnet.phys.tue.nl>; from kurt@garloff.de on Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 01:31:50AM +0200

On Tue, Apr 24 2001, Kurt Garloff wrote:
> I get it. But not over the whole disk.
> Doing a read speed measurement on /dev/hda, I constantly get ~16 MB/s.
> Not bad, but less than I'd expect. Measuring single partitions, some show
> the same, some show significantly more, 26MB/s--18MB/s, depending on the
> position of the partition on disk. Those look good!
> 
> There are enough partitions to see a clear pattern: Those with mounted ext2
> filesystems perform better. Umounting them does not harm, they just need to
> have been mounted once. reiser or (v)fat however don't improve anything.
> swap does, as does a ext2 over raid5.

You wouldn't happen to have 4kB ext2 filesystems on those? When ext2
mounts, it sets the soft blocksize to that then, I would expect this to
give at least some benefit over using 1kB blocks (as your IDE partition
otherwise would have).

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2001-04-24  8:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-04-23 23:31 Kurt Garloff
2001-04-24  8:58 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2001-04-24  9:05   ` Kurt Garloff
2001-04-24  9:14     ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010424105858.C9357@suse.de \
    --to=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=kurt@garloff.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®