From: Nicholas Lentz <nickpda255@yahoo.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: gcc 2.95.2 and kernel 2.2.18
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 01:14:13 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010427081413.15232.qmail@web4603.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
Is it safe for me to use gcc 2.95.2 (release, the one
that is in slack 7.1 contrib) with kernel 2.2.18? I
was just wondering because gcc 2.95.2 compiles
programs that run much faster than egcs. Are there
any known issues with 2.2.18 or higher and gcc 2.95.2?
Please CC me directly in all replies as I am not
subscribed to the kernel mailing list
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
next reply other threads:[~2001-04-27 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-27 8:14 Nicholas Lentz [this message]
2001-04-28 16:55 ` Alex Ramos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010427081413.15232.qmail@web4603.mail.yahoo.com \
--to=nickpda255@yahoo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®