From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 27 Apr 2001 13:32:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 27 Apr 2001 13:31:52 -0400 Received: from asterix.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de ([134.109.132.84]:16258 "EHLO asterix.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 27 Apr 2001 13:31:35 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 19:31:31 +0200 From: Ingo Oeser To: Alan Cox Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Negative values of cat /proc/sys/fs/inode-nr Message-ID: <20010427193131.K706@nightmaster.csn.tu-chemnitz.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Alan, Hi linux-kernel, I just saw, that cat /proc/sys/fs/inode-nr gives negative values for the second part. 559 -211555 or 174805 -3 I'm using 2.4.3-ac13. I see this both on SMP and non-SMP, HIGHMEM and non-HIGHMEM, if that matters. The first value for the second example (SMP+HIGHMEM machine) also seems a bit large... exact .config or more data available, if needed. Otherwise this kernel is very stable for me, and it feels really good in interactive performance. Regards Ingo Oeser -- 10.+11.03.2001 - 3. Chemnitzer LinuxTag <<<<<<<<<<<< been there and had much fun >>>>>>>>>>>>