Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit

[Ingo Oeser <ingo.oeser@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de>]

On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 11:40:40PM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > >     An interesting option (though with less-than-stellar performance
> > > characteristics) would be a dynamically expanding swapfile.  If you're
> > > going to be hit with swap penalties, it may be useful to not have to
> > > pre-reserve something you only hit once in a great while.
> > This makes amazingly little sense since you'd still need to
> > pre-reserve the disk space the swapfile grows into.
> It makes roughly the same sense as over-committing memory.
> Both are useful, both are unreliable.

And we have the one, so we should also implement the other one to
be totally unreliable.

*gd&r*

Ingo Oeser
-- 
10.+11.03.2001 - 3. Chemnitzer LinuxTag <http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/linux/tag>
         <<<<<<<<<<<<     been there and had much fun   >>>>>>>>>>>>