From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 1 May 2001 10:09:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 1 May 2001 10:09:30 -0400 Received: from mnh-1-15.mv.com ([207.22.10.47]:46085 "EHLO ccure.karaya.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 1 May 2001 10:09:14 -0400 Message-Id: <200105011522.KAA01925@ccure.karaya.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 To: Ingo Oeser Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux Kernel Debuggers, KDB or KGDB? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 01 May 2001 11:37:58 +0200." <20010501113758.D3305@nightmaster.csn.tu-chemnitz.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 10:22:14 -0500 From: Jeff Dike Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ingo.oeser@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de said: > Basically you could add support for ALL generic subsystems, that > support dummy hardware, like SCSI and ISDN for example. > Is that planned or do I suggest sth. stupid here? ;-) Neither. I know squat about hardware, so I had no idea that SCSI and ISDN would be easy to do from UML. If the SCSI and ISDN people want to produce appropriate UML drivers, I take patches :-) Jeff