From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 2 May 2001 13:53:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 2 May 2001 13:53:38 -0400 Received: from mnh-1-08.mv.com ([207.22.10.40]:12040 "EHLO ccure.karaya.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 2 May 2001 13:53:23 -0400 Message-Id: <200105021906.OAA03542@ccure.karaya.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 To: ingo.oeser@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox Subject: Re: Linux Kernel Debuggers, KDB or KGDB? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 02 May 2001 17:55:16 +0100." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 02 May 2001 14:06:31 -0500 From: Jeff Dike Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk said: > > Is this sufficient to do driver development? TUN/TAP doesn't let me > > write > > ethernet drivers inside UML. > For ISDN not really. For SCSI yes - scsi generic would let you write a > virtual scsi adapter 'owning' some physical devices Fine, so go ahead and write a UML SCSI adapter... I would love to see this happen. If you need UML help that's not on the site, let me know, and I'll be happy to do what I can. Jeff