From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 4 May 2001 05:13:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 4 May 2001 05:13:09 -0400 Received: from pec-89-74.tnt6.b2.uunet.de ([149.225.89.74]:260 "HELO sonne.glowinginthesun") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 4 May 2001 05:12:52 -0400 Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 10:12:19 +0200 From: Hendrik Volker Brunn To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: pdc20267 both channels share one IRQ Message-ID: <20010504101219.A300@sonne.glowinginthesun> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Is it ok for an Promise Ultra 100 to have both channels assigned the same IRQ? I have one DTLA-307030 attached as master to each channel and get transfer rates at around 12 - 16 MB/s. As I have heard people reporting transfer rates of about 24 - 28 MB/s I was wondering if there were some connections. Is it me just being dumb and ignoring obvious facts or something misconfigured weirdly with my system? Hendrik I'm subscribed. -- "And I'm right. I'm always right, but in this case I'm just a bit more right than I usually am" -- Linus Torvald, Sunday Aug 27, 2000. ## Linux 2.4.4 running on an i586 ##