From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 4 May 2001 23:18:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 4 May 2001 23:18:19 -0400 Received: from f00f.stub.clear.net.nz ([203.167.224.51]:36880 "HELO metastasis.f00f.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 4 May 2001 23:18:14 -0400 Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 15:18:08 +1200 From: Chris Wedgwood To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Jens Axboe , Rogier Wolff , Linus Torvalds , Alan Cox , volodya@mindspring.com, Alexander Viro , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] SMP race in ext2 - metadata corruption. Message-ID: <20010505151808.A29451@metastasis.f00f.org> In-Reply-To: <200105041140.NAA03391@cave.bitwizard.nl> <20010504135614.S16507@suse.de> <20010504172940.U3762@athlon.random> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010504172940.U3762@athlon.random>; from andrea@suse.de on Fri, May 04, 2001 at 05:29:40PM +0200 X-No-Archive: Yes Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 05:29:40PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: once block_dev is in pagecache there will obviously be no-way to share cache between the block device and the filesystem, because all the caches will be in completly different address spaces. Once we are at this point... will there be any use in having block devices? FreeBSD appears to have done without them completely about a year ago (an observation, not a comment on whether this is a good idea or not). --cw