From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 9 May 2001 12:57:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 9 May 2001 12:57:12 -0400 Received: from gateway.sequent.com ([192.148.1.10]:31857 "EHLO gateway.sequent.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 9 May 2001 12:57:06 -0400 Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 09:56:58 -0700 From: Mike Kravetz To: "Andrew M. Theurer" Cc: lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , samba-technical Subject: Re: Linux 2.4 Scalability, Samba, and Netbench Message-ID: <20010509095658.B1150@w-mikek2.sequent.com> In-Reply-To: <3AF97062.42465A53@austin.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3AF97062.42465A53@austin.ibm.com>; from atheurer@austin.ibm.com on Wed, May 09, 2001 at 11:29:22AM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 11:29:22AM -0500, Andrew M. Theurer wrote: > > I am evaluating Linux 2.4 SMP scalability, using Netbench(r) as a > workload with Samba, and I wanted to get some feedback on results so > far. Do you have any kernel profile or lock contention data? -- Mike Kravetz mkravetz@sequent.com IBM Linux Technology Center