From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 9 May 2001 16:02:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 9 May 2001 16:02:32 -0400 Received: from ghostwheel.underley.eu.org ([217.97.235.9]:51980 "EHLO bobas.nowytarg.top.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 9 May 2001 16:02:20 -0400 From: Daniel Podlejski To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3 In-Reply-To: <01050910381407.26653@bugs> In-Reply-To: <01050910381407.26653@bugs> X-PGP-Fingerprint: 4D 72 53 F8 FE 8C 53 B9 66 AD F6 EA C9 17 CD 82 X-Homepage: http://www.underley.eu.org/ Message-Id: <20010509195357Z5310367-757+3@witch.underley.eu.org> Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 21:53:50 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In linux-kernel, martin@bugs.unl.edu.ar wrote: : We are waiting for a server with dual PIII, RAID 1,0 and 5 18Gb scsi disks to : come so we can change our proxy server, that will run on Linux with Squid. : One disk will go inside (I think?) and the other 4 on a tower conected to the : RAID, which will be have the cache of the squid server. Reiser is not good idea for squid cache. Why ? Squids cache is hashed by default to minimize "big directory effect". Reiserfs is fast on realy big directories, but it eat more cpu than ext2. On high loaded cache servers cpu utilization on reiser can be realy big. Better way is make more subdirectories in squid cache, and use filesystem, that eat less of cpu. -- Daniel Podlejski ... I am immortal, I have inside me blood of kings, I have no rival, No man can bemy equal ...