From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 9 May 2001 20:35:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 9 May 2001 20:35:24 -0400 Received: from mail.intrex.net ([209.42.192.246]:32017 "EHLO intrex.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 9 May 2001 20:35:13 -0400 Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 20:36:08 -0400 From: jlnance@intrex.net To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3 Message-ID: <20010509203608.A30613@bessie.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <01051001124700.06492@starship> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from goemon@anime.net on Wed, May 09, 2001 at 04:19:53PM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 04:19:53PM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote: > On Thu, 10 May 2001, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > It would be great to see a table of ReiserFS/XFS/Ext2+index performance > > results. Well, to make it really fair it should be Ext3+index so I'd > > better add 'backport the patch to 2.2' or 'bug Stephen and friends to > > hurry up' to my to-do list. > > Is the IBM JFS at a testable state yet, or is it still 'bleedin beta'? It is not stable enough to use in production yet. It is certainly stable enough to test/benchmark. They released a new patch today which is supposed to fix a long standing deadlock, so thats good news. Give it a shot. Jim