From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S135760AbREIWgl>; Wed, 9 May 2001 18:36:41 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S135764AbREIWgb>; Wed, 9 May 2001 18:36:31 -0400
Received: from deliverator.sgi.com ([204.94.214.10]:49013 "EHLO
	deliverator.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S135760AbREIWgS>; Wed, 9 May 2001 18:36:18 -0400
Message-Id: <200105092238.f49McZW13343@jen.americas.sgi.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4
To: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
cc: Steve Lord <lord@sgi.com>, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
        " =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mart=EDn=20Marqu=E9s?=" <martin@bugs.unl.edu.ar>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yura@namesys.com
Subject: Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3 
In-Reply-To: Message from Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com> 
   of "Wed, 09 May 2001 07:30:04 PDT." <3AF9546C.4B45FDA7@namesys.com> 
Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 17:38:35 -0500
From: Steve Lord <lord@sgi.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


Hans Reiser wrote:
> XFS used to have the performance problems that Alan described but fixed them 
> in
> the linux port, yes?
> 
> Hans

Hmm, we do things somewhat differently on linux, but I suspect most of it
is due to hardware getting faster underneath us. 

Steve